How Semantic Analysis Impacts Natural Language Processing

In the late 1940s the term NLP wasn’t in existence, but the work regarding machine translation (MT) had started. In fact, MT/NLP research almost died in 1966 according to the ALPAC report, which concluded that MT is going nowhere. But later, some MT production systems were semantic nlp providing output to their customers (Hutchins, 1986) [60]. By this time, work on the use of computers for literary and linguistic studies had also started. As early as 1960, signature work influenced by AI began, with the BASEBALL Q-A systems (Green et al., 1961) [51].

In fact, the complexity of representing intensional contexts in logic is one of the reasons that researchers cite for using graph-based representations (which we consider later), as graphs can be partitioned to define different contexts explicitly. Figure 5.12 shows some example mappings used for compositional semantics and the lambda  reductions used to reach the final form. The above discussion has focused on the identification and encoding of subevent structure for predicative expressions in language. Starting with the view that subevents of a complex event can be modeled as a sequence of states (containing formulae), a dynamic event structure explicitly labels the transitions that move an event from state to state (i.e., programs). The long-awaited time when we can communicate with computers naturally-that is, with subtle, creative human language-has not yet arrived. We’ve come far from the days when computers could only deal with human language in simple, highly constrained situations, such as leading a speaker through a phone tree or finding documents based on key words.

Title:Semantic Representation and Inference for NLP

We have bots that can write simple sports articles (Puduppully et al., 2019) and programs that will syntactically parse a sentence with very high accuracy (He and Choi, 2020). But question-answering systems still get poor results for questions that require drawing inferences from documents or interpreting figurative language. Just identifying the successive locations of an entity throughout an event described in a document is a difficult computational task. The first objective gives insights of the various important terminologies of NLP and NLG, and can be useful for the readers interested to start their early career in NLP and work relevant to its applications. The second objective of this paper focuses on the history, applications, and recent developments in the field of NLP.

The exception to this occurs in cases like the Spend_time-104 class (21) where there is only one subevent. The verb describes a process but bounds it by taking a Duration phrase as a core argument. For this, we use a single subevent e1 with a subevent-modifying duration predicate to differentiate the representation from ones like (20) in which a single subevent process is unbounded.

About this article

So, it will be interesting to know about the history of NLP, the progress so far has been made and some of the ongoing projects by making use of NLP. The third objective of this paper is on datasets, approaches, evaluation metrics and involved challenges in NLP. Section 2 deals with the first objective mentioning the various important terminologies of NLP and NLG. Section 3 deals with the history of NLP, applications of NLP and a walkthrough of the recent developments. Datasets used in NLP and various approaches are presented in Section 4, and Section 5 is written on evaluation metrics and challenges involved in NLP.